|
|
|
|
|
|
by readams
3045 days ago
|
|
|
It certainly complicates the picture. I think the only way to make this workable is if you adopt a convention that you specify your minimum dependency if you're a library, but the current version if you're an executable. Of course, this could just be codified in the tool, which would be a big improvement. It also makes testing a lot harder though since your library ends up tested against a different version than what your users are using. Ugh. |
|
|