Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by MechEStudent 3046 days ago
Hydrogen has hard risks, and high costs. Density. Corrosion. Tunneling/leaking. A new trillion-dollar distribution infrastructure to replace the fluid-version we use for petrol.

What about methanol? We can convert hydrogen to hydrocarbon. Liquid is dense, much less dangerous, less acidic, less leaky, and our current trillion-dollar infrastructure already uses it as a substantial additive.

1 comments

Methanol isn’t a common additive is it? Most (all?) gasoline in the US has ethanol added.
Methanol is commonly sold as "octane booster". It's definitely around.
Is it in common use as such? Meaning 92 octane is 88 buffered with methanol? If it’s just in those little octane booster bottles, I would not consider that a “substantial additive“ in the context of the trillion dollar petroleum industry.
Around here it is used (in solution!) as ballast in tractor tires.