[MadSudaca]

There are far better cryptocurrencies to do this than BTC. Today, an actual venezuelan, part of the team working on a cryptocurrency called Nano, twitted that he paid for his meal with it.

This would have never been possible with BTC, why? Mainly because the meal's cost was .5 NANO, which currently amounts to ~5 USD, that would have been the cost of the transaction fee alone for BTC, or even more. Nano is feeless and has transactions taking 10 seconds on average to complete.

Nano is a cryptocurrency that is already making an impact in Venezuela specifically, check it out. Bitcoin days are numbered.

Tweet: https://twitter.com/Mrlutavo/status/963948510679830528

Nano's website: https://nano.org/en

[freejulian]

> , part of the team working on a cryptocurrency called Nano

Please, stop shilling.

[MadSudaca]

I thought the post what about how to help with Venezuela's hyperinflation.

There couldn't be a more relevant cryptocurrency for this than Nano. Especially because Nano isn't mined, it has a fixed supply that was distributed via faucet by solving a very complicated captcha. Many coins went to people in Venezuela because they found solving captchas a more profitable way of spending their time than a real job. So Nano is already popular in Venezuela and does a better job working as a currency than bitcoin.

I have a very favorable opinion of the technology behind Nano and not so favorable of BTC, so my post might be regarded a shill. However, given the reasons above I think mentioning Nano is relevant to the thread.

[dang]

That breaks the site guidelines, which we'd appreciate it if you'd read and follow when commenting here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

If you're genuinely concerned about astroturfing or shilling on HN, please email us at [e-mail] so we can look into it. One thing we'd do is look for a pattern of such behavior. At first glance, I'm not seeing that here, and the Venezuelan connection seems specific enough not to be forced.