[emodendroket]

That's essentially the argument NC has presented for why Uber is not sustainable.

[mseebach]

In that case they make very bad arguments, because such an equilibrium would be expected to be quite stable (although Uber might not be part of it).

[emodendroket]

If Uber "is not part of the equilibrium" then that would suggest it wasn't sustainable.

[mseebach]

So they would have preferred it, possibly come to a different conclusion, if Uber would have been likely to be established as a perpetual monopoly?

[emodendroket]

It's not a normative argument.

[mseebach]

So they did not base any decision on the observation?

[emodendroket]

I don't understand what you are asking.