Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by wil421 3051 days ago
I thought about bridging an Ubiquit EdgeRouter and putting in front of the AT&T gateway. You must pass authentication back to the gateway. Users were also reporting around 100megs max speed which wasn’t acceptable for me since I pay for gigabit.

There is a new line of EdgeRouters out and maybe it has some acceleration for bridging. I would like this setup.

2 comments

You might try this: https://github.com/jaysoffian/eap_proxy

You have to enable `set system offload ipv4 vlan enable` else your routing performance will suffer.

Hey that’s me! I’m glad it’s working for you. All credit to the folks who figured out this bypass. I just coded it up in Python when I couldn’t get some of the other solutions to work for me.
Ha! Small world on HN. I haven't personally tried the Edgerouter solution. I've been trying to replicate on pfSense/BSD, but it isn't as simple as you might think. :/

https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=111043.0

Yeah that seems like a bit of a headache. I appreciate your dedication to sticking with pfSense.
I get wirespeed routing from my ERL on my 1Gps connection. If it’s maxing out at 100 Mbps, those folks have it configured so that it’s having to route with the CPU.
I can’t find the dslreports link but here is one on the Ubiquiti forums . You can see the comments below about 100Mbps. The dslreports was slightly different but same results.

[1]https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Stories/Bypassing-AT-a...

That post configures the ERL in bridging mode. The ERL simply isn't suitable for that. Don't buy an ERL if you need to use it in a configuration that it can't offload and expect more than 100Mbps performance. It's got a minimal CPU, so yes, performance will suffer if it can't offload.

You don't need to use bridging mode to bypass the AT&T RG. That post probably predates the EAP proxy solution.

https://github.com/jaysoffian/eap_proxy