|
|
|
|
|
by ravenstine
3052 days ago
|
|
Shouldn't that liability come with owning the device? I don't understand how we've come to think, as a legal system, that the maker of a tool is responsible for the behavior of modifications made to their tool. Maybe that's not even true, but it seems to be believed so. If it is, I find it preposterous. Perhaps there's some money to follow. Washing machines can malfunction and cause fires, hypothetically. Just because one device is designed in a way that is particularly dangerous doesn't mean the same reasoning can't be applied to another device that is dangerous to a lesser degree. |
|
Not just hypothetically: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12610218
Mind you, those were unmodified so the maker does take the blame; but if the cause is known, modifications can make them safer too.