|
|
|
|
|
by CryptoPunk
3058 days ago
|
|
>>The question purposed is "are cryptocurrencies a worthy alternative to existing mediums of exchange". The question was never posed by the story submitted. It was asked as a segue into a missive against cryptocurrencies and the alleged unfairness of those with foresight to mine early getting rich as a result of the market value of what they mined rising. >>and then the rules change for new users who exert the same work energy to receive less payment. Like I said, not only is this inaccurate (e.g. the rules never change in mining), this is a major diversion from the topic of the story, and is going to turn this into another cryptocurrency debate, which you seem intent on having. |
|
https://blockchain.info/charts/difficulty?timespan=all
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/40411/can-a-smar...
The topic of the story covers the history of money.
The comment merely informs the history of crypto currencies like Bitcoin which is marketed as an alternative money ( "Bitcoin, an Electronic Cash System" ). The minting, economics, and game theory of said crypto currencies is the highlight of the comment in regards to money/value/exchange systems.
The author of the paper, Nick Szabo, is a direct contributor to the concepts behind the current trend of crypto exchange systems.
See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medium_of_exchange
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_currency