[harryh]

We don't asses penalties in this country based on the resources of the perpetrator. All are equal before the law (at least that is the aspiration. we obviously fall short in many instances.).

And besides, your idea is non sensical. We should confiscate their property knowing that they have the resources to get it back in order to induce some higher lawyer fees and a pain-in-the-ass factor as some kind of penalty increase? That's bizarre! That's not how government should work at all! It ends up being a waste of time and resources for a lot of people and, as you mention, draws in innocent 3rd parties who end up taking some of the heat.

If we actually wanted a higher penalty for richer people than there should just be a bigger fine or late fee.

[ryanackley]

Dude, you're presenting a straw man argument. This entire thread, I've been saying I don't want them to be treated differently.

YOU are the one defending special treatment. Isn't that what has happened here?! They've successfully lobbied the city to treat them differently than everyone else?

All I was saying is it's harder to feel sorry for them. If you really cared about this issue, I'm sure you could find REAL tragedies that aren't being heard by the city council every single time the city does these tax sales. Like actual families being evicted for "clerical mistakes".

[harryh]

I don't think anyone should have their property confiscated without warning for a clerical error. I think that everyone should be treated equally in that respect.