|
|
|
|
|
|
by greglindahl
3051 days ago
|
|
|
What's realistic about calling for a large-scale rollout of something which has never been built, in an industry where cost-overruns are typical? Shouldn't you build at least one before betting the farm on it? Meanwhile, coal is already on the way out in the US, replaced by... unrealistic? ... power sources. |
|
|
(Sorry for the delay in responding, busy times...)
If you read the ThorCon material, you'll find that there's nothing controversial about its design. It's all based on the solid ORNL molten salt work. ThorCon is in the process of building a first reactor, which will likely be in Indonesia due to the broken nuclear approach in the US.
"Meanwhile, coal is already on the way out in the US, replaced by... unrealistic? ... power sources."
Most of the true replacement (reliable) power is natural gas, which still produces very significant CO2. Wind and solar will never really be effective replacements without reliable backup power, even with grid storage. The problem is there will eventually be an outlier event where there is too much calm air, and too much overcast, to supply enough electricity. At that point lots of people will die, if it's very hot or very cold. Reliable power is very important.