[pankajdoharey]

I dont buy this argument, for one reason and one reason alone. When we started integrating silicons we had similar problems of noise and distortion due to circuits packed so close. There was always scope for corruption of signals and then the problem got amplified when these circuits started working at higher frequencies. A high end processor these days could be 4Ghz, such a high frequency data transaction already creates distortion, so we employed many schemes to circumvent these things most notably using different wire interconnects, going smaller and using various chemical shielding. His key argument revolves around noise/distortion which is not a good argument. If the math doesn't work then its a real problem. Also massiveness argument is also not correct because it was given for computers aswell that we will never be able to build smaller computers and yet we did.