|
|
|
|
|
by shubhamjain
3067 days ago
|
|
I don't usually complain "what the heck are they doing with that kind of money." But, from a cursory look, Asana seems to be one of the most functionally simple Project Management software I have seen. I know it's trite to undermine the complexity of software, but in this case, I can't find many reasons why they need that kind of money. What are they doing that necessitates a big team (251-500 employees)? The software isn't handling massive amounts of data. Its complexity seems comparable to Trello, which raised only $10M (<7% of Asana's total funding) [1]. How are they burning this amount of cash? Am I missing something? [1]: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/trello |
|