Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by scriptingnerd 3063 days ago
Sadly, while the 21% tax law is great for companies, it can suck for those of us who sling code for a living. This administration is hostile to unions, and the last administration was not overly happy to support them but in name only. America is simply not a terribly friendly place for unions. I wish our tech scene looked more like Norway or Sweden, but good luck with that...
3 comments
thestephen 3063 days ago
Why would you want that? When it comes to working immigrants, the Swedish unions generally have the power to say no [1], which they use – several high-skilled immigrants have been thrown out of Sweden the past two years.

[1] https://www.affarsvarlden.se/juridik_affarer/facken-stoppar-... (Swedish)

link
Kiro 3063 days ago
If you think unions are strong within the tech scene in Sweden, you're wrong. I don't know anyone working in tech that's a member of a union tbh.
link
conanbatt 3063 days ago
> I wish our tech scene looked more like Norway or Sweden

Why is this?

link
peoplewindow 3063 days ago
I've found Americans frequently believe/are told by their media that Norway and Sweden are forms of socialist paradise - basically sort of what Marx wanted but never achieved.

It's not quite clear why anyone thinks that. As far as I know Sweden has a pretty typical welfare state and union laws, comparable to the UK. It's a very politically left society in general with respect to things like identity politics, but economically it's not much different to France or the UK or other countries with publicly funded healthcare.

link
dalbasal 3063 days ago
Well... Nordics have had a generation of good, effective governance. Ie, the hospitals, schools and such are run quite well as are state finances. I think that's the key thing others are jealous of. I would say that is more of a democratic success than a socialist one.

Economically in those countries and much of central Europe (notably Germany), large old companies, their unions and government are merged to some extent or at least highly cooperative. The result is a sort of company based welfarism in exchange for incumbent protection. Good and bad aspects to that, but it takes a lot of stress out of the system. It's very hard to fire people. It's also hard to build new large companies.

I'm not sure if the system is transferable elsewhere or even buildable if it doesn't already exist. You can't just conjure up a Siemens.

It's certainly not Marxist, itd probably be classed as right wing structurally if we go by the terms of the late 19th.

link