> cherry-picked negative aspects of using other languages and irrelevant details
I don't understand? Why are they irrelevant? They're basically Pony's reason for existing... Cheap, efficient and safe concurrency, coupled with very high level of type-safety, is the main selling point on Pony. It is much better on these counts than many other languages. Maybe I shouldn't have mentioned Python and Ruby, I'll edit the post.
> It's the aggressive tone
I see. Compared with the charming politeness of the OP comment, I must have sounded really rude. I apologize.
I don't understand? Why are they irrelevant? They're basically Pony's reason for existing... Cheap, efficient and safe concurrency, coupled with very high level of type-safety, is the main selling point on Pony. It is much better on these counts than many other languages. Maybe I shouldn't have mentioned Python and Ruby, I'll edit the post.
> It's the aggressive tone
I see. Compared with the charming politeness of the OP comment, I must have sounded really rude. I apologize.