|
|
|
|
|
by ljf
3070 days ago
|
|
Nuclear (from what I understand) usually has both far higher bid/pitched costs, plus an agreement to pay those over a longer period. Plus they usually come with finance or arranged finance. The risk is in the building, but once built they are (in theory) a cash cow. But govt seem to find all sorts of ways to subsidise them - offering the clean up etc. P |
|