[thethirdone]

> The Conpenhagen interpretation is flat out wrong by any reasonable philosophy of science.

AFAIK, this is an exaggeration to the point of incorrectness.

The Copenhagen interpretation may be a poor interpretation which introduces absurd complicated ideas rather than the simpler ideas of other interpretations, but that doesn't make it "flat out wrong".

[pikchurn]

You ignored the "philosophy of science" part. Philosophy of science is how we decide which of two theories is "correct" when they offer the same experimental predictions. See also my reply to a sibling comment.