|
|
|
|
|
by iak8god
3068 days ago
|
|
> Hope the explanation helps. Absolutely. > We can either adopt a norm of honoring what the writer intended or a norm of honoring what the reader observed. I think a lot of people who are most vocally pro-diversity use the later norm when determining if something is or isn't ????ist. If this is the norm I think it should be universally the norm. Gods, I hope this does not become the norm. "Everything can mean anything!" |
|
As a conservative it kind of feels like that is the case. The second named party in the Google suit got fired for an interpretation of his comments he didn't mean.