|
|
|
|
|
by onderkalaci
3068 days ago
|
|
> I doesn't even really seem to me you necessarily want to partition on time since your load distribution is going to be terrible. I think that's not accurate. The tables mentioned in the post are first sharded/distributed on `repo_id`. Later, each shard is also partitioned on time dimension (i.e., `created_at `). Thus, the load should be distributed proportionally with the activity for each `repo_id`. |
|