Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pcwalton 3067 days ago
There are definitely reasons behind C's success. Most important was that it was the language of Unix, which spread like wildfire in the '70s and '80s because it was free.

There are equally important reasons why C's usage has been in steady decline from the '90s to today.
1 comments
WalterBright 3067 days ago
> Most important was that it was the language of Unix

More important was it was the only language that really worked on DOS, which ruled the computer biz for 10 years. I would guess 80% of programming was done for DOS, and C was a very good fit for the 640K systems.

link
pjmlp 3067 days ago
On my corner of the planet we were using Turbo Pascal, Turbo Basic, Quick Basic, Clipper, FoxPro, DBase.

C and C++ had no special place on the spectrum of programming languages usage, unless we were porting code between MS-DOS and UNIX.

Until it was time to move into Windows, and anyone not using C or C++ started to be left behind, manually writing FFI wrappers (e.g. Turbo Pascal/Delphi) and we eventually migrated to one of them.

link
sedachv 3067 days ago
None of that is true at all. Turbo Pascal was hugely popular on DOS in the 1980s into the early 1990s. It wasn't until Windows 3.1 that Turbo Pascal really started losing market share to C. You are also completely forgetting about Apple. IBM PC compatibles did not even pass 50% market share until 1986.
link
pcwalton 3067 days ago
Well, sure, but Microsoft wouldn't have chosen to promote C if not for the success of Unix. :)
link
pjmlp 3067 days ago
Quite true, and on those days Microsoft was equally promoting Quick Basic and Quick Pascal, while writing MS-DOS in pure Assembly.
link