|
|
|
|
|
|
by throwaway5752
3066 days ago
|
|
|
Because they don't have any leverage in this situation. I read the article, I don't see how this fundamental reality can be worked around. City Y has no disincentive to undercut City X until the NPV of HQ2 is equal to the cost of their incentive package. This is just a reverse auction process. |
|
|