|
|
|
|
|
|
by kazinator
3072 days ago
|
|
|
> and instead collectively bargained with the company? Because they are not a collective; only one of them gets Amazon HQ2. Let's project this to actual "collective bargaining" in labour. If you and 19 other people were negotiating in such a way that only one of you gets a raise and improved working conditions, and the remaining nineteen others get fired, would you still engage in "collective bargaining"? |
|
|