|
|
|
|
|
by Brockenstein
3073 days ago
|
|
>But the chosen city would win even more if they were to cooperate. Right and the 19 losers are cooperating why again? >Sure, the cooperation would quickly break down Good job undercutting and highlighting the faults in your own argument. If you can figure it out in two sentences I think there's probably a few people directly involved who this is obvious to. So since cooperation isn't viable in your own estimation, might as well try to win. >but that is why the federal government should decide on such benefits Unfortunately that proposition doesn't appeal to everyone, so good luck there. |
|