[joshberkus]

I wouldn't say that you need deep knowledge at this point. However, you do need at least journeyman level knowledge. Lots of folks (including me, on Patroni) are working to make more things automatic and lower the knowledge barrier, but we're not there yet.

A big part of the obstacle is that preserving state in a distributed environment is just hard, no matter what your technology, and the failure cases are generally catastrophic (lose all data, everywhere). This is true both for the new distributed databases, and for the retrofits of the older databases. So building DBMSes which can be flawlessly deployed by junior admins on random Kubernetes clusters requires a lot of plumbing and hundreds of test cases, which are hard to construct if you don't have a $big budget for cloud time in order to test things like multi-zone netsplits and other Chaos Monkey operations.

Making distributed databases simple and reliable is a lot like writing software for airplanes, but clearly that's possible, it's just hard and will take a while.

[joshberkus]

Also, the article does show us the kind of knowledge that admins will always need to have, such as the tradeoffs between asynchronous and synchronous replication.