|
|
|
|
|
by matthewbauer
3075 days ago
|
|
Interesting thoughts but I think "the sum of transaction fees people will spend in the future" is better as a value for mining (after rewards go to 0). "Holders" really aren't wanting anything to do with transactions. My Bitcoin valuation: Bitcoin is worth as much as it costs to move to another blockchain. That's the "first-mover advantage" basically and I'm afraid it's much closer to $200 million than $200 billion. |
|
Personally I believe in efficient markets. I think the $200B is the best guess the market came up for the intrinsic value of BTC. Independent of speculation.
My feeling is similar to yours though. That BTCs value is closer to $200m then to $200B.