Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by LudoA 3071 days ago
Why AdNauseam instead of uBlock?
2 comments

It's a fork of uBlock, so it has the exact same base functionality, but as an additional benefit it helps fight the ad industry actively.
> as an additional benefit it helps fight the ad industry actively

What does that mean, and why would I want to fight the ad industry actively? (I'm being serious, I don't like the tracking of the ad industry generally resorts to online, but I think blindly assuming the whole industry has no value whatsoever is very shortsighted)

Edit: Man, I hate when I write 300+ words on a a reply only for the parent comment to be deleted prior to my getting to post it. :/

It still loads the ads and the things they link to, so it spends your bandwidth and CPU power on creating noise/fake signals for the ad networks.
Ah, so it fights online ad profile generation and tracking from ad networks. That's laudable (and useful).
Profile generation maybe: if it clicks randomly, the ad network doesn't know what's a "good ad" for you

Tracking I'd say less: your browser is loading the ads embedded in various sites and reveals more than if it just blocked.

Because it's so bad for ad business that even google store blocked it.