Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nonbel 3072 days ago
Since this is a screening test, I don't think that 15 million number is correct for prevalence.

You are using % of population diagnosed with cancer. The correct value would be the % of population with undiagnosed cancer.

1 comments

True. That is really difficult to obtain though. But assuming that most people are eventually diagnosed with cancer (even if just close to death), then a similar maybe a little lower population must have undiagnosed cancers.

In the end you'll need a properly conducted study with random undiagnosed people to get reliable numbers though.

It seems like pretty basic info to me. There should be some estimate out there somewhere, especially given the billions of dollars spent each year on studying cancer. A quick search didn't lead to anything promising though.