[TomMarius]

Let me rephrase. If you'd force Facebook to allow "free speech" (you want to force someone to let you do something on their property and you call that free?), you'd break Facebook owners' constitutional rights to private property.

Not having "free speech" on Facebook isn't because the constitution doesn't apply to companies, it's because Facebook is like someone's house - private property - first amendment doesn't apply in my grandma's house as well.

They still have to oblige to your right of privacy etc, as I said, in Europe, you could sue (FB can't even use the photo tagging feature in EU because it'd be against the laws).

The constitution is just a basic law, it applies to corporations as well, it just doesn't speak about them much.

BTW, I don't really think you guys in the US should believe that your government will or will not do something because of something like the constitution - remember NSA? Remember Kim Dotcom?