It's beneficial in an overall sense, but it sucks for the many individuals and families who will be gentrified out of the city, because they don't have the skill/background/age/race/gender to partake in the new orgy.
When attempting to counter an un-alloyed good like "50k new high-paid jobs" with potential negatives, can you please be clearer about the alternative outcome you desire? I can't tell from your objection whether you:
1) Support the 50k jobs, but want extra effort to be taken to support existing populations/communities
2) Prohibit the 50k jobs so things can stay the same
3) Let the 50k jobs go elsewhere so they're not a local problem
1) Support the 50k jobs, but want extra effort to be taken to support existing populations/communities
2) Prohibit the 50k jobs so things can stay the same
3) Let the 50k jobs go elsewhere so they're not a local problem
4) Something else entirely that I'm missing