[pc86]

> But if they're rejecting you just because they detect you're headless, etc

Isn't that their right?

If I pay for my outgoing bandwidth (even if I don't) I am under no obligation to give my content/data/whatever to any third party source, even academic.

[TeMPOraL]

> If I pay for my outgoing bandwidth (even if I don't) I am under no obligation to give my content/data/whatever to any third party source, even academic.

Aren't you? You put a server on the publicly routable Internet. And made it talk over HTTP. At this point I believe you've already chosen to waive your rights not to serve content.

[davvolun]

Isn't that the same argument regarding ripping music CDs? If I pay for the musicians, manufacturing and distribution costs to put a CD in stores, etc.

Although, I think you're framing it wrong, you're not obligated to give the content, someone is just choosing to consume it in a way you hadn't intended.

[Nullabillity]

You're free to stop providing the content at all.

But as long as you're providing it publicly then it makes no sense that you'd be able to dictate how it's consumed.