[lyk]

Not sure if you're trolling, but the network is being accessed by bypassing the captive portal. The network is being accessed in a way that isn't permitted.

[zb3]

So the network is not password protected, DNS (or ICMP) works normally, but somehow using it in a particular way is not permitted? Then why does it work at all?

[gsich]

And how should I know that there is a captive portal? I connect (connection is established after receiving IP address!) and use iodine (or similar).

[tedunangst]

I'm sure the jury will be delighted to hear your explanation.

[loup-vaillant]

"I used iodine all the time, so I can't even notice the presence of a captive portal, if any."

"My son handles the computer stuff for me, I don't even know about that logging page you're talking about."

"I thought restricted networks had a WPA-2 password? That's what they use at my workplace."

[pbhjpbhj]

"The door to the house was open, move of the stuff was tied down, how could i be expected to know I wasn't authorised to use it??"

Judges just aren't that stupid.

[loup-vaillant]

Here's the thing: I never give my real name to captive portals. I don't even give a real email address.

Who can tell me with a straight face that this is criminal behaviour

[gsich]

Only that the comparison is stupid.

[gsich]

Why should this go to court? I'm not sure if you have understood what this thread was about.