[onewaystreet]

> That such an elementary claim about a volatile asset is controversial almost says more than the article.

That it's such an elementary claim is the reason for the pushback. What's the point in saying something obvious?

[JumpCrisscross]

> What's the point in saying something obvious?

Saying something obvious (e.g. circles are round) isn't the same as refuting something obvious (e.g. circles are squares).

[hateduser2]

Because people unfailingly pushback against it. The pushers should start their push acknowledging that it is possible if it’s really such an elementary claim to them.