|
|
|
|
|
by TulliusCicero
3084 days ago
|
|
Yes and no: - People often want to limit housing in their particular city/neighborhood, but - They agree that there should be more housing built somewhere, just not near them It's like being for pollution regulations, except that you demand that you yourself (and your buddies) be exempt. Normally that wouldn't work in a democracy, but imagine that only the polluters get to vote: that's how land use regulations get decided (because the beneficiaries of lower housing costs would be largely potential residents, and you have to live there to vote). In practice, the solution is to have zoning decisions made at a higher level; at the metro area level is probably the best one, since they tend to function as economic units, and that mimics how people tend to choose housing. |
|