[pyromine]

Uber has already been seen to act adversarial to law enforcement, raids are utilized to try and limit Uber's ability to conceal information. I have no doubt in my mind that Uber would willingly fail to comply to requests for information.

[king07828]

The mirror image of your argument is just as applicable:

Law enforcement has already been seen to act adversarial to private interests, remotely logging out of computers is utilized to try and limit law enforcement's ability to obtain information beyond the scope of a warrant. There is little doubt that law enforcement would willingly take information beyond the scope of the warrant and later find a way to use it against them.

[Bendingo]

> Law enforcement has already been seen to act adversarial to private interests

If enforcing law is seen as adversarial to private interests, then those private interests are by definition, against the law.

[dta5003]

Really? By that logic the private interest of a lot of non-white drivers of staying alive must be against the law. The time for hero worship and blind trust is over.