|
|
|
|
|
by jdeibele
3084 days ago
|
|
What kills me about the advertising are three things: 1) It creates a huge barrier to entry because new ISPs have a hard time getting any name recognition. 2) Newpapers, radio stations, and television stations probably wouldn't want to say anything bad about telephone or cable providers. Imagine the phone call an NBC TV station would get if it attacked Comcast. That advertising is a good chunk of money. 3) Advertising is rolled into the PUC-approved "cost of doing business" and the cable or telephone companies get to add their profits on top of that. |
|
This is accomplished by adding a price metric to the routing protocol so that packets are routed along the best and cheapest paths.
So if you notice that a certain neighborhood has bad service, you can set up some kind of connection to it and sell into that network to make a profit. No advertising. The end users will only notice their internet access getting cheaper and or better.