[cmurf]

Maybe if you're concerned about that, don't hold what is essentially a public party that will inevitably have a member of the press show up and cover it. You have to be pretty stupid to set up something like this and then get all whiny about it being exposed. If you want it private, then actually keep it private. There is no effort here to keep it private, if anything it's flaunted as if everyone else is the fool for not noticing the intentional exploitation that's going on routinely in the industry.

[rdlecler1]

This isn't a public party. This was a private party at a private residence.