|
|
|
|
|
by frabbit
3084 days ago
|
|
Cycling is similar KSI (killed-seriously-injured) per hour travelled as driving and walking according to some measurements. The trick is in calculating exposure: per-trip, per-distance and per-time all give different results. Per-time often suggests that cycling is safer compared to other modes of transport[1]. Per-trip and per-distance flip between cycling and driving[2]. Interestingly, being a public transit user works out the safest under both of these metrics. " I also understand that there are bad chauffeurs on the road too, but from my experience, far less than bad cyclists..." Your comment, which to be fair is not unusual, is essentially concern trolling. This impression is reinforced by your retailing of your measureless anecdote about how cyclists are worse than car drivers for being "bad". Essentially, cycling is safe enough. Cyclists are not worse than any other road users. However compared to other road users they are not contributing to CO2 and are substantially less likely to kill other road users or suffer health problems stemming from low exercise levels. [1] http://careymcandrews.org/pdf/McAndrews_et_al_Accident_Anal_...
[2] https://journal.cpha.ca/index.php/cjph/article/download/3621... |
|