|
|
|
|
|
|
by dontnotice
3086 days ago
|
|
|
They seem to suggest that Google's control over their own site's design/function is somehow an affront to their cause, not mention malicious. They certainly see it as a big enough grievance to include in a manifesto type document which repugnantly entitled. |
|
|
You seem to suggestthat OP's control over their own site content (ie the manifesto) is somehow an affront to your belief in google's free speech.
You certainly see it as a big enough grievance to write a comment on HN which is repugnantly entitled.
They get to pass comment on google's behaviour (a comment which, incidentaly, a lot of people seem to agree with). You get to pass comment on their behaviour. I get to pass comment on your behaviour.
Holding people and companies to account in a soft manner, without resorting to force (legislation counts as force) is an important aspect of a functioning free society. The freedom of speech is not freedom from criticism but freedom to criticise.