| > My point is that Jules is wrong that capitalists will permit you to set up a communist society. The non-communist countries tried to sabotage the communist ones, true. (And vice versa - a cold war is like that.) That is not at all the same as saying that, within a capitalist countries, the capitalists will not permit you to set up a commune. Your argument (and link) therefore do not actually address jules' point at all. > In addition, a commune within a capitalist society would still be reliant on the labor of an external, exploited proletarian class. How does that address jules' point (or even mine)? > Communism is internationalist. Ultimately this is the failure of first world social democratic programs that provide decent gains for their working classes but do so at the expense of oppressed peoples in the global south. How does that address jules' point (or even mine)? Starting a commune in the US doesn't exploit the oppressed in the global south whatsoever. This is why I say it looks like you're just looking to spew talking points. You're saying a lot, but it's not relevant to the subject. |
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html