[lurr]

> That's a defensible approach, even today

Not if you are dishonest about it. Not if you refuse to learn from the past couple decades.

[AnimalMuppet]

In what way is Go dishonest about it? In what way have they refused to learn from the past couple decades?

[lurr]

I think insisting that they need more use cases for generics is dishonest when you consider they used generics to implement library data types themselves.

I don't mean they are outright lying, or are bad people or anything like that.