|
|
|
|
|
|
by soVeryTired
3090 days ago
|
|
|
His comparison to literature falls short in another way: he only considers the great writers. Sure, Dostoevsky is hard to read. But most writers aren't Dostoevsky: some writing is just hard to read because it's bad. I think a better comparison would be to undergraduate essays. Most of the time the essential points are there, but if the author doesn't know how to write coherently the result is confusing. |
|
|