[rcarmo]

Because we're all using Go for other projects (even if piecemeal) and would like to build the entire project in a single language.

[bsaul]

i personaly only would use go for very technical, low-level middlewares (as in, just above the OS layer) involving networks.

The good side to it being simple to understand and maintain is that you won't pay a lot of debt if you're adding it to your stack.

There isn't a single language that fits all use case perfectly anyway, so we'd have to just go to the "best tool for the job" approach in the meantime.

[sd8dgf8ds8g8dsg]

> i personaly only would use go for very technical, low-level middlewares.

Care to extend upon why you don't feel go is a good fit for other programming?