“most socially apt people should have Facebook accounts”
This is like saying that most people who know a lot about food should regularly visit McDonalds since it is the most eaten-at restaurant.
I would venture the opposite, people who are socially apt and attuned are probably least likely to be on Facebook... they’ve likely learned enough about it to stay far, far, away.
No. E.g. I'm fine with Telegram & Signal + WhatsApp & Skype for the elderly. Having no intention to become a public person, do I really need a public profile on a web site that's whole purpose is to spy on me everywhere, analyse my behavior and contacts, sell the data to others and show me ads?
I absolutely believe you. When I actually need to voice-call somebody (e.g. mom, granny or a client company CEO, all the other people I meet prefer texting) I use Skype - it does this much better than any of the competitors. So it sounds fairly probable it does video better than others too.
It'll have a better chance of avoiding down votes if you leave this out. It's against the guidelines:
> "Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading."
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html