I've re-read my article several times now, because your comment (particularly its score) has made it clear that I must improve. For that, though, I need more feedback. Do you mean that the logic isn't good, that the language isn't good, or both?
The heart of the article is the expectation that whoever can bring a complete, seamless experience to the mobile platform will be the big winner through the next few years, and that they will probably be a large incumbent.
All the rest is meant to be framing for the conversation. Not tools for prediction, but for explanation.
Please, if you can express what I need to fix to make this article better than "gibberish" or "unintelligible", let me know, because I want to be capable of expressing my thoughts. I want to improve.
It reminds me of that "news consumption over time" strata chart that made the rounds last year, whose data source was its author's own perception of history.
The heart of the article is the expectation that whoever can bring a complete, seamless experience to the mobile platform will be the big winner through the next few years, and that they will probably be a large incumbent.
All the rest is meant to be framing for the conversation. Not tools for prediction, but for explanation.
Please, if you can express what I need to fix to make this article better than "gibberish" or "unintelligible", let me know, because I want to be capable of expressing my thoughts. I want to improve.