|
|
|
|
|
|
by progman
3081 days ago
|
|
|
>After all, what use is a nuanced term if it can't reliably convey that additional information. I would recommend the general term "A/B compiler" where A and B are arbitrary regular languages. That way it would be pretty clear what a Pascal/C compiler is, or a JVM/Webasm compiler, for instance. Or a x86/C compiler which would also make the word "decompiler" obsolete. |
|
|