Thats not the point, the xrp being cannot be bought by one entity because there are already millions of addresses and this has a helpful effect on the network and was designed for this exact scenario
Read up on it yourself, I think its some form of staking or validating
Im not the evangelist of Ripple just because Im not succumbing to widespread ignorance and flawed analogies
Right its not, what does that have to do with my grandparent post
My point was that the ripple network wouldnt be useless for the entity that bought 99.99% because of the network structure, I’m not sure what your point is
Another user of the network would need to buy xrp from the majority holder, there’s nothing controversial about that. Diamonds function the same way for DeBeers except they have a much lower standard of utility until the owning entity created a new use for them.
> what does that have to do with my grandparent post
your gp was response to my question, so i thought you thought you somehow addressed it
> ripple network wouldnt be useless for the entity that bought 99.99% because of the network structure
what is "network structure"? it can't be the residual 20XRP on everybody's accounts because those are equal to 0XRP as you've just agreed to.
the point that somebody can still buy XRP from the majority holder^W^W the effective sole owner of all usable XRP is sort of irrelevant, because you can make the same point about any other commodity/currency.
Xrp holders have some function in the network, I forgot
And you could name the price for anyone else that wanted xrp or to use the network
Although I would say Ripple’s XRP is not the settlement solution Id be looking for, I wouldnt say owning 99.999% of them makes it worthless
Owning all of a commodity doesnt make it worthless, even when that commodity is a unique collection of cryptographic signatures