[forapurpose]

> the American university system has a distinct political agenda that is opposed to the interests of the Trump-supporting half of the American electorate.

The ideological conservative movement repeats this claim, but it doesn't make it so. Can you substantiate it? Can you define what it means?

Like any ideological movement, there can be no debate or discussion; anyone who fails to drink the kool-ade and promote the ideology must be silenced. It can't be that the facts simply are inconvenient to the ideology, that reasonable people can disagree, or that a member of the movement could learn something. The ideology is correct and those who don't accept it are apostates.

They'd done that with climate scientists, journalists, the entire State Department, universities, and more.