|
|
|
|
|
by andrewingram
3090 days ago
|
|
It bothers me a bit that it feels intentionally dismissive of (or oblivious to) the current state-of-the-art of JavaScript frameworks. None of the criticism mentioned feel like an honest reflection of my last two years working with React (4 years total). Universal rendering is mainstream, there are plenty of options for vastly simplifying initial setup and overall complexity (eg Next.js). From what I understand, similar is true of Vue and Ember. I can genuinely see the value in tech like Stimulus and Pjax as a way of augmenting an existing traditionally-coded app without needing a total rewrite. But this document seems to be arguing for its place in the world of 2-3 years ago, rather than the present-day. |
|
This is definitely not software for you then.