|
|
|
|
|
by sasidharm
5786 days ago
|
|
Not sure why Oracle is getting so much flak for protecting and monetizing their acquired assets. They are doing what Sun had failed to do, which is monetizing the Java platform effectively, thus leading them to sell themselves to Oracle.
Granted, software patents can be pretty meaningless and i believe that there should be no software patents at all. But this seems like the only way Java platform can be monetized (through licensing). I kind of wish Sun had the balls to do this kind of thing earlier. |
|
That's sort of like saying that you admire one mafioso more than the other, because he has fewer compunctions about killing people in order to extort money, even though you're against the "killing people" tactic in general.
The entire Android stack is open source, and is not software that was implemented by Sun/Oracle. The class library comes from the Apache Software Foundation. Is Oracle going to sue Apache next? Who else might they sue?