Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by another-one-off 3094 days ago
None of the things my grandparent mentioned are externalities.

The cost of energy consumed is directly borne by the people mining the bitcoins. The costs of the power gluts should be being directly borne by the customers (I'm pretty sure it is in Germany, I don't know about California).

The energy market is distorted by government interference, sure, but the costs are clear and (unless the regulators are doing something really stupid) being borne by parties with skin in the game.

1 comments

The cost of electricity is artificially low because it doesn't include the cost of the associated pollution.
Probably so, but that doesn’t affect Bitcoin mining any more than any other usage of electricity.