But I have to distinguish peace in Israel vs. peace in the Middle East.
Peace in Israel is likely to be a military kind of peace where no one dares attack, and with the Palestinians having their own state, no one has a good excuse anymore.
But they will still have bad excuses, because no one is even trying to bring peace to the Middle East.
i.e. it will be a famous conflict zone for a lot longer than you might expect because of Sunni/Shia conflict.
Also the underlying hate and antisemitism will persist even after the Palestinian negotiate a state, giving another reason for it to stay a famous conflict zone.
> Quick, who was involved in bringing peace to Northern Ireland?
But I have to distinguish peace in Israel vs. peace in the Middle East.
Peace in Israel is likely to be a military kind of peace where no one dares attack, and with the Palestinians having their own state, no one has a good excuse anymore.
But they will still have bad excuses, because no one is even trying to bring peace to the Middle East.
i.e. it will be a famous conflict zone for a lot longer than you might expect because of Sunni/Shia conflict.
Also the underlying hate and antisemitism will persist even after the Palestinian negotiate a state, giving another reason for it to stay a famous conflict zone.
> Quick, who was involved in bringing peace to Northern Ireland?
St. Patrick :)