|
|
|
|
|
by shawnee_
3099 days ago
|
|
they’re an algorithm company, not a product company. As a result, their core, algorithm based, functionality is successful, but they fail at new product design over and over, creating and retiring flawed products ad infinitum. Interesting that this refusal to adapt still persists. After reading this article, I dug up my old (2006) rejection email from Google; and just as I remembered, it wasn't quite so nice. This is basically what it said: "After careful review of your qualifications, we've determined that you have nothing. None of your skills are a match for anything at Google, and we don't foresee that changing any time in the near future. Good luck in your endeavors." I'd applied as a technical writer. Today I'm writing documentation at Intel for data scientists, engineers, and machine learning experts. Because guess what? Algorithms will get you only so far. Sometimes you don't need to add more engineers to solve a difficult problem, you just need better documentation. |
|